





- Second - You Can Keep Your Current Provider - This is one of those "true lies" of the health care debate from what I can see. According to the current legislation Government run health care would be "managed care". Do you currently have "managed care" aka an HMO? I don't. So what they aren't telling you when you hear "your provider doesn't have to change" is that the provider may not change but the form of coverage will. So if you are like me with a PPO, gone is the ability to select any doctor and see specialists at my discretion. Sure, I'd still have Aetna but not Aetna PPO. I'd be forced to use Aetna HMO. This is necessary to keep costs in line with what the government thinks it can afford. Apparently the current billl provides a brief "grace period" before you are forced to convert.
- Third - Care for Seniors - Do you happen to know anyone who is retiring? Well, then as you may know their primary insurer automatically becomes Uncle Sam (Medicare - other insurers are always secondary). The current bill intends to trim overall Medicare spending 10%. Not a huge change but at the same time those cuts take place, Medicare will see a 30% increase in their participant rolls. Huh? More people but less money for seniors care? I wonder how they will pull that off (you might ask)? Well, apparently we don't have to wonder. As one example, the current plan intends to enforce limits on care for dementia. This is more of the fun "rationing" described above. Apparently the doctor tasked by the White House with health reform (Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel) has spoken publicly about severly limiting seniors care, specifically the care for dementia. He feels that those who are of a certain age aren't the best use of limited health care resources.
"So do you like what you hear so far? Well if you don't then the next item may be the coup de grace.
- Fourth - Who is Exempt from Participating in Federal Health Care - Think about this one for a minute. Who might be allowed to skate on participation in FEDERAL health care? Who would our legislators favor in such a way that they are not required to participate is such a bad plan? That's right, themselves! Our elected officials have written into the current bill that THEY do not have to participate in a Federal Health Care program. It won't be their care that is rationed. It won't be thier kid with a rare disease whose life hangs in the hands of someone in DC. Gee, if their plan is so great, why not participate?
"Last, if you are wondering how you and I will be forced into a government run plan, I am not completely sure on the details (like I said, I am still looking at this). But from what I understand, the idea is that as employers are offered the option of a federal plan that is (on the surface) much cheaper, they will likely shift in droves. Afterall, can you really imagine a company like GM declining the opportunity to offload much of it's health care burden? further, in Canada private insurance that competes with goverment offered insurance is simply not allowed. Do they intend to do the same here? I don't know."Look, can I see that some in our society go without important health care? Sure. Is this the best solution? Not in my opinion."Maybe you know someone who is old and may suffer from dementia. Maybe you know someone who is young and has a rare disease. Maybe you know someone about to retire. This isn't a hypotherical exercise in an Ivy League course on the benefits of socialism. This is for real and it will impact us all. So what do you think?"Dave"(7/21)
playing with the train itself. Good marketing....
Charlie did pretty well. Even though I knew we'd only have two seats, I brought Charlie's car seat on, thinking that he'd sleep no problem once I fed him and the hum and rumble of the plane kicked in and that would be worth squishing with Davey into the other seat. He did, but only for 15 minutes. So the three of us had to squish into the two seats with a car seat that a tired Charlie definitely did not want to stay in. At least the flight was only 3 hours.

10 years later
Roses and Red Violets are blue
Your Anniversary is here
8 years plus 2!!
Your wedding day
Bright sunshine, romance
Then we picked Dave up for a picture
And almost split his pants
A beautiful bride and her adorable groom
Happy wedding guests and family
Filled the festive room
Who knew back then
Where your future would lead
What states you would live in
Moving with such speed
Michigan, Utah, California and now
You live in state where your boys can see cows
And what did you think
You would think when you thought
An MBA sounds good, and
so you both sought
And learned and grew,
debated and analyzed,
a career that would challenge
would be your winning prize
And now for your family
Two boys of your own
Happy bouncing and fun
Already they’ve grown
My love for you both
And the memories we’ve shared
Means so much to me
To have family that cares
So Happy Anniversary
I can’t believe it’s ten
So many good times ahead and
A quick look back at where you’ve been